2015 Judicial Evaluation Survey Results

2015 JUDICIAL EVALUATION SURVEY RESULTS

 A total of 465 surveys were emailed out to TCBA members and a total of 47 questionnaires were returned, representing 10.1 percent of the TCBA membership.

Responses were tabulated and an average rating for all respondents was calculated. Only ratings between 1 and 5 were included; “Don’t Know” and items not rated were excluded when calculating the averages.  The averaged results in each category are listed below.

*N=The number of Surveys returned for each Judicial Officer that had numeric ratings. OVERALL PERFORMANCE is an average of how the judge was rated overall by each attorney, not an average of their ratings in the other categories.

Superior Court Room 204 – Judge Gary R. Tabor (N =41 )   
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            3.39
DECISION MAKING                          4.13
EFFICIENCY                                       4.27
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           3.93

Superior Court –F&JC – Judge H. Christopher Wickham (N =40)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            3.58
DECISION MAKING                          3.61
EFFICIENCY                                       3.72
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           3.40

Superior Court Room 102- Judge Anne Hirsch (N =42)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            3.23
DECISION MAKING                          3.32
EFFICIENCY                                       3.41
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           3.46

Superior Court Room 201- Judge Carol Murphy (N =37)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            3.01
DECISION MAKING                         3.44
EFFICIENCY                                      3.34
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           3.19

Superior Court Room 202- Judge Mary Sue Wilson (N=14)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT         3.67
DECISION MAKING                       2.98
EFFICIENCY                                    2.96
OVERALL PERFORMANCE        3.79

Superior Court Room 101-Judge James Dixon (N =36)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            4.11
DECISION MAKING                          4.34
EFFICIENCY                                       4.31
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           4.38

Superior Court –F&JC- Judge Christine Schaller (N =41)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT              4.22
DECISION MAKING                            4.63
EFFICIENCY                                         4.52
OVERALL PERFORMANCE              4.56

Superior Court Room 203- Judge Erik D. Price (N =30)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT          3.35
DECISION MAKING                        3.53
EFFICIENCY                                      3.61
OVERALL PERFORMANCE          3.47

Commissioner Indu Thomas (N =31)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            3.18
DECISION MAKING                          3.06
EFFICIENCY                                       3.39
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           3.19

District Court Judge Brett Buckley (N =25)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            4.38
DECISION MAKING                          4.19
EFFICIENCY                                       4.15
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           4.20

District Court Judge Samuel G. Meyer (N =25)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT            4.14
DECISION MAKING                          4.17
EFFICIENCY                                       3.99
OVERALL PERFORMANCE           4.00

District Court Judge Kalo Wilcox (N =20)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT               4.02
DECISION MAKING                             3.61
EFFICIENCY                                          3.69
OVERALL PERFORMANCE              3.50

Commissioner Jonathon Lack (N=26)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT           3.27
DECISION MAKING                         3.11
EFFICIENCY                                      2.99
OVERALL PERFORMANCE          2.88

Commissioner Paul Wohl (N=16)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT              4.18
DECISION MAKING                           4.03
EFFICIENCY                                         4.18
OVERALL PERFORMANCE             3.88

Commissioner Rebekah Zinn (N=14)
JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT             3.14
DECISION MAKING                           3.09
EFFICIENCY                                         2.96
OVERALL PERFORMANCE             3.14

 

Heather Ligtenberg2015 Judicial Evaluation Survey Results